well we could all fill in our own versions of the rest of that; i particularly would go with something about qweeffing. I also have found that for the last year or so, everytime i read a byline or headline that suggests that what follows is a report about something he has said, i immediately stop and reject it out of hand. The man is incapable of telling the truth. Some columnists/reporters in the last few days profer that Bush is completely out of the loop of reality, and sent forward with talking-pointed speeches written by a closed staff surrounding Rove. Then Rove tells Scotty boy exactly what to say for the next couple of hours, and as the dutiful boob Scotty is, he regurgitates and vomits ad infinitum.
Cheney isn't much different. He seems particularly incapable of saying anything about anything other than increasing the level of fear among the populace. He certainly cares not one iota for truth or fact, yet seems to actually understand what may be real, and chooses to ignore it, whereas his puppet-twin is completely clueless. I am beginning to think there is a prankster farce element to it all, within Bushco itself. Send out "W" with a speech filled with lies, watch him speil and fill the verbiage with emotional energy, and then listen to him freak out when Scotty repeats Rove's corrections to what the shrubbery said. They must throw dice or spin a wheel for whose turn it is to come up with the next version of this prank. Someone pulls the short straw and is forced to actually tell the raging shrieking alcoholic mumbler that he misspoke; while the "winner" is the one who crafts the text in such a way that even Scotty has to equivocate in his later followup corrective lying.
Because if it isn't a prank, if it isn't a joke, then all of these people are freaking insane.
You have discovered arachnoanarchy
otter clan omarian otter oasis
